Sunday, March 16, 2008
latest breaking news on infotech....
check out what the net should be used for, as per the poles:
http://infotech.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msid-2860799.cms
http://infotech.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msid-2860799.cms
Thursday, March 13, 2008
Re: At St Columba's, another turn of the screw
i think the principal has a point on the "bad" company thing ... though i guess moving to another school might not solve this problem.
1. if this is the stated policy (it was done last year), i guess the argument of it not being known (to students/parents) can not be applied this year?
2. internal exams are very rarely "impossible" to pass, especially with marking done by the same teachers who have taught the subject, since most of the questions come almost directly from the notes / class work. this does not hold true for board exams! yes, passing requires paying attention in class and doing some work at home
3. the other schools principals (at least DPS) who have commented have rather hefty fees. for this payment, they hardly care if the student continues to stay in their school, since they would turn over a handsome profit from this too (correct me if i'm wrong on this).
my 3 cents :-P
1. if this is the stated policy (it was done last year), i guess the argument of it not being known (to students/parents) can not be applied this year?
2. internal exams are very rarely "impossible" to pass, especially with marking done by the same teachers who have taught the subject, since most of the questions come almost directly from the notes / class work. this does not hold true for board exams! yes, passing requires paying attention in class and doing some work at home
3. the other schools principals (at least DPS) who have commented have rather hefty fees. for this payment, they hardly care if the student continues to stay in their school, since they would turn over a handsome profit from this too (correct me if i'm wrong on this).
my 3 cents :-P
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Dhruv Kalra wrote:
Quite Shocking !! glad this didn't happen at our time
Dhruv
---------- Forwarded message ----------
At St Columba's, another turn of the screw
Preeti Jha
Posted online: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 at 0025 hrs IST
New Delhi, March 10
Forty-eight students from St Columba's School at Ashok Place — who recently failed in one or more exams in the Class XI finals — have been asked to seek admission elsewhere.
When Anthony Fernando went to collect his report card on Saturday, he was nervous about his results. But he wasn't expecting to be told by the principal that the school no longer wanted him. "I'm feeling very bad, I've been studying here since KG," said Fernando.
Br Pinto, who is the acting principal while Br Lobo, the principal, is in the US on study leave, said, "we are advising parents to readmit failed students in other schools".
Defending the move as "the best thing for such a child," he added: "These students need a new environment to get away from present bad company. Then there's a chance they'll do better in life."
Fernando Senior had pleaded for a second chance for his son. "How will I get him admitted in another school at the last moment?" he asked.
But Br Pinto told him that it was not his responsibility.
The school had apparently employed a similar policy last year, when 47 students of Class XI were asked to leave. "Most got admission in other schools," said Br Pinto.
According to him, Br Lobo had spoken to each class individually, telling students that they must pass the end-of-year exams to be promoted to Class XII. But parents said no such warning was issued.
The students had to pass in at least one of their five subjects and score 33 per cent or more in the rest. Fifteen marks — "grace" — were available for transfer across subjects.
But Joseph Gomez, who failed in one subject, has not received any grace marks, which would have lifted his score of 31.5 per cent.
"I just flunked economics. The principal told me he didn't want me in school anymore. I can't believe they're kicking me out," he said.
Gomez wanted to know why there's no option of taking the exam again. "Even in the boards you are given a re-test," added his father. "The lives of our children depend on these crucial years in Class XI and XII. I know my son has made a mistake. He must be more committed. But schools must support us, they are their kids too."
"This sort of response to failure is risky, children need support," said another parent, Teresa Srinath.
Br Pinto has his reason. "These kids are not interested in learning," he said. "They think Class XI is a breeze. Some marks were in single digits. How much can we do? And how much more space can we keep for them when Class X is graduating?"
ROOM TO BREATHE
"We feel that if a child is failing, then it's a signal that our teaching is bad. Children who don't do well are coached during the holidays."
Shyama Chona
Principal, Delhi Public School, R K Puram
"I don't believe in detaining a child only because we want a good result at the end of Class XII. We should not put a child under so much stress. At Salwan, if a student fails in one exam, he or she is given another test. Failing in more than one subject, a student is asked to retake the year; they are not asked to leave the school."
Vandana Puri
Principal, Salwan Public School, Rajendra Nagar
Education Secretary Rina Ray has not received any complaints regarding the recent incident at St Columba's. She urges parents to get in touch with the Directorate of Education so the matter may be investigated. "This is extremely unusual. We're not in favour of this. It is not at all child-friendly," she said.
(Names of students and parents have been changed to protect their identity)
Boyfriend vs husband!
a nice answer to the girlfriend upgrade to wife :-D
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Saha, Diptarup
This was quite funny! :)
Dear Tech Support,
Last year I upgraded from Boyfriend 5.0 to Husband 1.0 and noticed a distinct slow down in overall system performance -- particularly in the flower and jewellery applications, which operated flawlessly under Boyfriend 5.0.
In addition, Husband 1.0 uninstalled many other valuable programs, such as Romance 9.5 and Personal Attention 6.5 and then installed undesirable programs such as NFL 5.0, NBA 3.0, and Golf Clubs 4.1.
Conversation 8.0 no longer runs, and Housecleaning 2.6 simply crashes the system. I've tried running Nagging 5.3 to fix these problems, but to no avail.
What can I do?
Signed, Desperate
____________________________________________
Dear Desperate:
First keep in mind, Boyfriend 5.0 is an Entertainment Package, while Husband 1.0 is an Operating System. Please enter the command:
'I Thought You Loved Me.exe' and try to download Tears 6.2 and don't forget to install the Guilt 3.0 update.
If that application works as designed, Husband 1.0 should then automatically run the applications Jewellery 2.0 and Flowers 3.5.
But remember, over use of the above application can cause Husband 1.0 to default to Grumpy Silence 2.5, Happy Hour 7.0 or Beer 6.1.
Beer 6.1 is a very bad program that will download the Snoring Loudly Beta.
Whatever you do, DO NOT inst all Mother-in-law 1.0 (it runs a virus in the background that will eventually seize control of all your system resources).
Also, do not attempt to reinstall the Boyfriend 5.0 program. These are unsupported applications and will crash Husband 1.0.
In summary, Husband 1.0 is a great program, but it does have limited memory and cannot learn new applications quickly. You might consider buying additional software to improve memory and performance.
We recommend Food 3.0 and Hot Lingerie 7.7.
Good Luck, Tech Support
From: Saha, Diptarup
This was quite funny! :)
Dear Tech Support,
Last year I upgraded from Boyfriend 5.0 to Husband 1.0 and noticed a distinct slow down in overall system performance -- particularly in the flower and jewellery applications, which operated flawlessly under Boyfriend 5.0.
In addition, Husband 1.0 uninstalled many other valuable programs, such as Romance 9.5 and Personal Attention 6.5 and then installed undesirable programs such as NFL 5.0, NBA 3.0, and Golf Clubs 4.1.
Conversation 8.0 no longer runs, and Housecleaning 2.6 simply crashes the system. I've tried running Nagging 5.3 to fix these problems, but to no avail.
What can I do?
Signed, Desperate
____________________________________________
Dear Desperate:
First keep in mind, Boyfriend 5.0 is an Entertainment Package, while Husband 1.0 is an Operating System. Please enter the command:
'I Thought You Loved Me.exe' and try to download Tears 6.2 and don't forget to install the Guilt 3.0 update.
If that application works as designed, Husband 1.0 should then automatically run the applications Jewellery 2.0 and Flowers 3.5.
But remember, over use of the above application can cause Husband 1.0 to default to Grumpy Silence 2.5, Happy Hour 7.0 or Beer 6.1.
Beer 6.1 is a very bad program that will download the Snoring Loudly Beta.
Whatever you do, DO NOT inst all Mother-in-law 1.0 (it runs a virus in the background that will eventually seize control of all your system resources).
Also, do not attempt to reinstall the Boyfriend 5.0 program. These are unsupported applications and will crash Husband 1.0.
In summary, Husband 1.0 is a great program, but it does have limited memory and cannot learn new applications quickly. You might consider buying additional software to improve memory and performance.
We recommend Food 3.0 and Hot Lingerie 7.7.
Good Luck, Tech Support
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
boys will be boys...
Friday, March 07, 2008
Shift Happens Video
a nice video about how things change... exponentially.
from: monu jain
interesting video
>
> > Shift Happens -
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMcfrLYDm2U
> >
>
from: monu jain
interesting video
>
> > Shift Happens -
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMcfrLYDm2U
> >
>